Medical Experts
Peterson
SmithT
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder of the neuromuscular junction characterized by fatigable weakness of voluntary muscles, including the ocular, facial, oropharyngeal, limb, and respiratory muscles. MG can be broadly characterized as either ocular MG (a form that is limited to the eyelid and extraocular muscles) or generalized MG (a form that commonly involves ocular weakness as well as a variable combination of weakness in the bulbar, limb, and respiratory muscles). Clinical and serologic testing can be used to diagnose MG, but diagnostic sensitivity varies depending on whether the patient has ocular or generalized MG. In addition to aiding in the diagnosis, antibody testing can inform prognosis and therapeutic approaches. Demonstration of acetylcholine receptor (AChR) binding antibodies, which are present in the majority of patients with generalized disease, provides laboratory confirmation of MG. If AChR antibody test results are negative, muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) antibody testing should be performed.
Quick Answers for Clinicians
A diagnosis of myasthenia gravis (MG) is often based on clinical history, neurologic examination, and laboratory confirmation. Antibodies against acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) and muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) are highly specific and sensitive for the detection of MG. For that reason, these laboratory tests have largely supplanted traditional bedside testing, including edrophonium testing (which is no longer available in the United States) and the ice pack test. When antibody test results are negative, neurophysiologic studies can help confirm the diagnosis. ,
Acetylcholine receptor (AChR) blocking and modulating antibodies are usually found in association with binding antibodies and have a higher prevalence in generalized myasthenia gravis (MG) than in ocular MG. Muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) antibodies have been reported in up to half of patients with generalized MG who lack AChR antibodies , ; these antibodies are generally not found in those with established ocular MG.
Patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (MG) who test positive for acetylcholine receptor (AChR) autoantibodies may be considered for thymectomy, which is associated with improved clinical outcomes. , Patients without detectable anti-AChR antibodies may still be considered for thymectomy, although the procedure is often reserved for those with poor response to immunosuppressive treatment. ,
Data suggest that acetylcholine receptor (AChR) autoantibody levels may correlate with disease severity, as well as treatment response, but additional investigation is necessary. Decreasing muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) antibody levels may be associated with therapeutic response; however, more studies are needed in this area.
Seronegative myasthenia gravis (MG) refers to the lack of detectable acetylcholine receptor (AChR) and muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) antibodies; this form of the disease is uncommon. These individuals may prove to be seropositive for AChR or MuSK antibodies if tested by a more sensitive method (e.g., live cell-based immunofluorescence assays), but these tests are not in widespread commercial use.
Indications for Testing
Testing for MG should be considered in patients presenting with new-onset fatigable muscle weakness, particularly when this weakness is accompanied by ptosis or diplopia.
Laboratory Testing
Diagnosis
MG is a condition that fulfills all major criteria for a disorder mediated by autoantibodies against AChR. After establishing a clinical diagnosis of MG based on characteristic presentation (e.g., ocular and bulbar muscle weakness), AChR serum antibody status should be determined. If AChR testing is negative, MuSK testing is advised. Serologic testing should be performed to confirm the diagnosis before beginning therapy.
Antibody Testing
Acetylcholine Receptor Antibodies
AChR antibodies are classified into three types: binding, blocking, and modulating. The AChR binding assay is the most clinically useful and frequently utilized test and is highly specific for MG. In general, a positive AChR binding test in a patient with a compatible clinical presentation is diagnostic for MG. AChR blocking antibodies are usually found in association with binding antibodies and have a higher prevalence in generalized MG than in ocular MG. Testing for modulating AChR antibodies has limited diagnostic value, but may be considered in the event of a negative binding test and high suspicion of MG.
AChR testing sensitivity varies depending on the type of MG; in generalized MG, the majority of patients have AChR antibodies, whereas these antibodies are present in roughly half of patients with ocular MG. , , A large number of individuals with AChR antibody-positive MG have thymic abnormalities, including thymic hyperplasia (most common) and thymic tumors. The absence of AChR antibodies does not rule out the diagnosis of MG. False-negative results may occur in the setting of immunosuppression or in patients who have received antivenom therapy.
Current evidence indicates there may be a positive correlation between AChR autoantibody levels and disease severity, as well as treatment response, although additional studies are needed. ,
Muscle-Specific Tyrosine Kinase Antibodies
In cases of generalized MG, approximately half of individuals without AChR antibodies have MuSK antibodies. , Therefore, MuSK antibody measurement is recommended if a patient is negative for AChR antibodies. Although radioimmunoassay (RIA) has traditionally been recognized as the definitive test for detection of MuSK antibodies, other laboratory testing methods have been shown to have comparable accuracy, including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and fixed cell-based immunofluorescence assay (f-CBA-IFA). Individuals with MG who are seropositive for MuSK antibodies are more likely than those without these antibodies to have atypical clinical features (e.g., selective muscle weakness that often spares the ocular and limb muscles), onset at a younger age, and no thymic pathology; this presentation is more likely to occur in females and is more typically severe. , As with the absence of AChR antibodies, the absence of MuSK antibodies does not rule out the diagnosis of MG.
Decreasing antibody levels may be associated with therapeutic response, which suggests that MuSK antibody levels might serve as a valuable biomarker when monitoring MG. However, more studies are needed in this area.
Other Myasthenia Gravis-Associated Antibodies
Other antibodies have been detected in patients with MG, including lipoprotein-related protein 4 (LRP4) and striated muscle antibodies. LRP4 antibody may be pathogenic in a small percentage of patients. , In contrast to detection of AChR or MuSK antibodies, detection of anti-LRP4 antibodies should be carefully interpreted within the clinical context, as the presence of these antibodies does not directly correlate with a diagnosis. ,
Striational antibodies are not specific for MG and may be seen in individuals with other autoimmune diseases and in cases of thymoma without MG. Striated muscle antibodies, when detected in the presence of AChRs, are associated with late-onset MG; as a marker for thymoma, striational antibody measurement is most useful in patients who are seropositive for AChR antibodies in early-stage MG. Titin is one of the major antigenic targets of striational antibodies, and testing for antititin antibodies may be useful when first-line diagnostic tests are negative or when screening for the presence of thymoma in patients with MG. Titin antibody levels may correlate with disease severity; however, more research is required before these antibodies are recommended for use as disease biomarkers. ,
ARUP Laboratory Tests
Quantitative Radioimmunoassay/Semi-Quantitative Flow Cytometry
Quantitative Radioimmunoassay/Semi-Quantitative Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/Semi-Quantitative Indirect Fluorescent Antibody/Semi-Quantitative Flow Cytometry
Quantitative Radioimmunoassay (RIA)/Semi-Quantitative Flow Cytometry
Quantitative Radioimmunoassay/Qualitative Radiobinding Assay/Semi-Quantitative Flow Cytometry/Semi-Quantitative Indirect Fluorescent Antibody
Quantitative Radioimmunoassay
Semi-Quantitative Flow Cytometry
Semi-Quantitative Flow Cytometry
Quantitative Radioimmunoassay (RIA)
Semi-Quantitative Cell-Based Indirect Fluorescent Antibody
Semi-Quantitative Indirect Fluorescent Antibody (IFA)
Semi-Quantitative Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
References
-
35976295
Estephan E, Baima JP, Zambon AA. Myasthenia gravis in clinical practice. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2022;80(5 Suppl 1):257-265.
-
33923771
Rousseff R. Diagnosis of myasthenia gravis. J Clin Med. 2021;10(8):1736.
-
33144515
Narayanaswami P, Sanders DB, Wolfe G, et al. International consensus guidance for management of myasthenia gravis: 2020 update. Neurology. 2021;96(3):114-122.
-
36094738
Meisel A, Baggi F, Behin A, et al. Role of autoantibody levels as biomarkers in the management of patients with myasthenia gravis: a systematic review and expert appraisal. Eur J Neurol. 2023;30(1):266-282.
-
39105625
Kaminsky HJ, Sikorski P, Coronel SI, et al. Myasthenia gravis: the future is here. J Clin Invest. 2024;134(12)e:179742.
-
33329350
Lazaridis K, Tzartos SJ. Myasthenia gravis: autoantibody specificities and their role in MG management. Front Neurol. 2020;11:596981.
-
38311009
Luong K, Lozier BK, Novis CL, et al. Comparison of three methods for the detection of antibodies against muscle-specific kinase. J Immunol Methods. 2024;526:113627.


Cite this page